1887
  1. Home
  2. Eurosurveillance
  3. Volume 24, Issue 49, 05/Dec/2019
  4. Article
Surveillance Open Access
Like 0
Download

Abstract

Background

Timely notification of infectious diseases is essential for effective disease control and needs regular evaluation.

Aim

Our objective was to evaluate the effects that statutory adjustments in the Netherlands in 2008 and raising awareness during outbreaks had on notification timeliness.

Methods

In a retrospective analyses of routine surveillance data obtained between July 2003 and November 2017, delays between disease onset and laboratory confirmation (disease identification delay), between laboratory confirmation and notification to Municipal Health Services (notification delay) and between notification and reporting to the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (reporting delay) were analysed for 28 notifiable diseases. Delays before (period 1) and after the law change (periods 2 and 3) were compared with legal timeframes. We studied the effect of outbreak awareness in 10 outbreaks and the effect of specific guidance messages on disease identification delay for two diseases.

Results

We included 144,066 notifications. Average notification delay decreased from 1.4 to 0.4 days across the three periods (six diseases; p < 0.05), reporting delay decreased mainly in period 2 (from 0.5 to 0.1 days, six diseases; p < 0.05). In 2016–2017, legal timeframes were met overall. Awareness resulted in decreased disease identification delay for three diseases: measles and rubella (outbreaks) and psittacosis (specific guidance messages).

Conclusions

Legal adjustments decreased notification and reporting delays, increased awareness reduced identification delays. As disease identification delay dominates the notification chain, insight in patient, doctor and laboratory delay is necessary to further improve timeliness and monitor the impact of control measures during outbreaks.

© Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2019.24.49.1900237
2019-12-05
2024-11-21
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2019.24.49.1900237
Loading
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/eurosurveillance/24/49/eurosurv-24-49-4.html?itemId=/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2019.24.49.1900237&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Reijn E, Swaan CM, Kretzschmar ME, van Steenbergen JE. Analysis of timeliness of infectious disease reporting in the Netherlands. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(1):409.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-409  PMID: 21624131 
  2. Bonačić Marinović A, Swaan C, van Steenbergen J, Kretzschmar M. Quantifying reporting timeliness to improve outbreak control. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21(2):209-16.  https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2102.130504  PMID: 25625374 
  3. Schumacher J, Diercke M, Salmon M, Czogiel I, Schumacher D, Claus H, et al. Timeliness in the German surveillance system for infectious diseases: Amendment of the infection protection act in 2013 decreased local reporting time to 1 day. PLoS One. 2017;12(10):e0187037.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187037  PMID: 29088243 
  4. Freeman R, Charlett A, Hopkins S, O’Connell AM, Andrews N, Freed J, et al. Evaluation of a national microbiological surveillance system to inform automated outbreak detection. J Infect. 2013;67(5):378-84.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2013.07.021  PMID: 23876330 
  5. Swaan C, van den Broek A, Kretzschmar M, Richardus JH. Timeliness of notification systems for infectious diseases: A systematic literature review. PLoS One. 2018;13(6):e0198845.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198845  PMID: 29902216 
  6. Bijkerk BHG, van der Plas SM, Siebbeles MF, Timen A, van ’t Veen A, van Vliet JA, et al. Melden van infectieziekten conform de Wet publieke gezondheid. [Reporting of infectious diseases in accordance with the Public Health Act]. Bilthoven: Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu; 2008. Dutch. ISBN: 978 90 6960 206 6. Available from: https://www.rivm.nl/publicaties/melden-van-infectieziekten-conform-wet-publieke-gezondheid-2008
  7. Ward M, Brandsema P, Van Straten E, Bosman A. Electronic reporting improves timeliness and completeness of infectious disease notification, The Netherlands, 2003. Euro Surveill. 2005;10(1):513.  https://doi.org/10.2807/esm.10.01.00513-en 
  8. Ernst MD. Permutation methods: a basis for exact inference. Stat Sci. 2004;19(4):676-85.  https://doi.org/10.1214/088342304000000396 
  9. Richardson M, Elliman D, Maguire H, Simpson J, Nicoll A. Evidence base of incubation periods, periods of infectiousness and exclusion policies for the control of communicable diseases in schools and preschools. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2001;20(4):380-91.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00006454-200104000-00004  PMID: 11332662 
  10. Vink MA, Bootsma MC, Wallinga J. Serial intervals of respiratory infectious diseases: a systematic review and analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 2014;180(9):865-75.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwu209  PMID: 25294601 
  11. Landelijke Coördinatie Infectieziekten (LCI). Richtlijnen en Draaiboeken. [Guidelines for infectious diseases]. Bilthoven: Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu. [Accessed: 11 Oct 2018]. Available from: https://lci.rivm.nl/richtlijnen
  12. World Health Organization (WHO). Joint external evaluation tool. International Health Regulations (2005). 2nd ed. Geneva: WHO; 2018. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/259961/9789241550222-engpdf?sequence=1
  13. Rietveld A, Schneeberger PM, Wijkmans CJ. [More and faster notification of infectious disease if notification is carried out by the laboratories instead of the diagnosing physician]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2005;149(6):304-7. PMID: 15730039 
  14. Chaintarli K, Jackson S, Cotter S, O’Donnell J. Evaluation and comparison of the National Tuberculosis (TB) Surveillance System in Ireland before and after the introduction of the Computerised Electronic Reporting System (CIDR). Epidemiol Infect. 2018;146(14):1756-62.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268818001796  PMID: 29976264 
  15. Altmann M, Spode A, Altmann D, Wadl M, Benzler J, Eckmanns T, et al. Timeliness of surveillance during outbreak of Shiga Toxin-producing Escherichia coli infection, Germany, 2011. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17(10):1906-9.  https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1710.111027  PMID: 22000368 
  16. Zucs AP, Benzler J, Krause G. Mandatory disease reporting by German laboratories: a survey of attitudes, practices and needs. Euro Surveill. 2005;10(1):512.  https://doi.org/10.2807/esm.10.01.00512-en 
  17. Day F, Sutton G. General practitioner notifications of gastroenteritis and food poisoning: cause for concern. J Public Health (Oxf). 2007;29(3):288-91.  https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdm043  PMID: 17622646 
  18. Paranthaman K, Kent L, McCarthy N, Gray SJ. Invasive meningococcal disease: completeness and timeliness of reporting of confirmed cases in Thames Valley, 2006-2007. Public Health. 2009;123(12):805-8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2009.10.015  PMID: 19958917 
  19. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Monthly measles and rubella monitoring report, January 2019. Stockholm: ECDC; 2019. Available from: https://ecdc.europa.eu/sites/portal/files/documents/measles-rubella-monthly-surveillance-report-january-2019.pdf
  20. Heil J, Ter Waarbeek HLG, Hoebe CJPA, Jacobs PHA, van Dam DW, Trienekens TAM, et al. Pertussis surveillance and control: exploring variations and delays in testing, laboratory diagnostics and public health service notifications, the Netherlands, 2010 to 2013. Euro Surveill. 2017;22(28):30571.  https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2017.22.28.30571  PMID: 28749331 
  21. Jansson A, Arneborn M, Skärlund K, Ekdahl K. Timeliness of case reporting in the Swedish statutory surveillance of communicable diseases 1998--2002. Scand J Infect Dis. 2004;36(11-12):865-72.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00365540410025348  PMID: 15764175 
  22. van der Maas NAT, Hoes J, Sanders EAM, de Melker HE. Severe underestimation of pertussis related hospitalizations and deaths in the Netherlands: A capture-recapture analysis. Vaccine. 2017;35(33):4162-6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.06.037  PMID: 28651837 
  23. Woudenberg T, Woonink F, Kerkhof J, Cox K, Ruijs WLM, van Binnendijk R, et al. The tip of the iceberg: incompleteness of measles reporting during a large outbreak in The Netherlands in 2013-2014. Epidemiol Infect. 2018;147:e23.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268818002698  PMID: 30298798 
Timeliness of infectious disease reporting, the Netherlands, 2003 to 2017: law change reduced reporting delay, disease identification delay is next
<p class="citation"> <span>Citation style for this article:</span> <span class="meta-value authors"> <a href="/search?value1=Corien+M+Swaan&option1=author&noRedirect=true" class="nonDisambigAuthorLink">Swaan Corien M</a>, <a href="/search?value1=Albert+Wong&option1=author&noRedirect=true" class="nonDisambigAuthorLink">Wong Albert</a>, <a href="/search?value1=Axel+Bona%C4%8Di%C4%87+Marinovi%C4%87&option1=author&noRedirect=true" class="nonDisambigAuthorLink">Bonačić Marinović Axel</a>, <a href="/search?value1=Mirjam+EE+Kretzschmar&option1=author&noRedirect=true" class="nonDisambigAuthorLink">Kretzschmar Mirjam EE</a>, <a href="/search?value1=Jim+E+van+Steenbergen&option1=author&noRedirect=true" class="nonDisambigAuthorLink">van Steenbergen Jim E</a></span>. Timeliness of infectious disease reporting, the Netherlands, 2003 to 2017: law change reduced reporting delay, disease identification delay is next. <a href="/content/ecdc">Euro Surveill.</a> 2019;24(49):pii=1900237. <a href="https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2019.24.49.1900237" title="doi link" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2019.24.49.1900237</a> <span class="ES_Article_citation"> <span class="generated">Received</span>: 09 Apr 2019;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span class="generated">Accepted</span>: 02 Aug 2019 </span> </p>
/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2019.24.49.1900237
/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2019.24.49.1900237
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Submit comment
Close
Comment moderation successfully completed
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error