1887
Research Open Access
Like 0

Abstract

Background

Progress towards the World Health Organization’s End TB Strategy is monitored by assessing tuberculosis (TB) incidence, often derived from TB notification, assuming complete case detection and reporting. This assumption is unlikely to hold in many settings, including European Union (EU) countries.

Aim

We aimed to assess observed and estimated completeness of TB notification through inventory studies and capture–recapture (CRC) methodology in six EU countries: Croatia, Denmark, Finland, the Netherlands, Portugal Slovenia.

Methods

We performed record linkage, case ascertainment and CRC analyses of data collected retrospectively from at least three national TB-related registers in each country between 2014 and 2016.

Results

Observed completeness of TB notification by inventory studies was 73.9% in Croatia, 98.7% in Denmark, 83.6% in Finland, 81.6% in the Netherlands, 85.8% in Portugal and 100% in Slovenia. Subsequent CRC analysis estimated completeness of TB notification to be 98.4% in Denmark, 76.5% in Finland and 77.0% in Portugal. In Croatia, CRC analyses produced implausible results while in the Netherlands and Slovenia, it was methodologically considered not meaningful.

Conclusion

Inventory studies and CRC methodology suggest a TB notification completeness between 73.9% and 100% in the six EU countries. Mandatory reporting by clinicians and laboratories, and cross-checking of registers, strongly contributes to accurate notification rates, but hospital episode registers likely contain a considerable proportion of false-positive TB records and are thus less useful. Further strengthening routine surveillance to count TB cases, i.e. incidence, accurately by employing record-linkage of high-quality TB registers should make CRC studies obsolete in EU countries.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.12.1900568
2020-03-26
2024-12-26
/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.12.1900568
Loading
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/eurosurveillance/25/12/eurosurv-25-12-7.html?itemId=/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.12.1900568&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. World Health Organization (WHO). Towards TB. Elimination: An Action Framework for Low-Incidence Countries. Geneva: WHO; 2014. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/132231/9789241507707_eng.pdf;jsessionid=EC9721BFBE157352FA6D239DACDF6119?sequence=1
  2. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe (WHO/Europe). Roadmap to implement the tuberculosis action plan for the WHO European Region 2016 – 2020: Towards ending tuberculosis and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Copenhagen: WHO; 2016. Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/318233/50148-WHO-TB-Plan_May17_web.pdf?ua=1
  3. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe (WHO/Europe). Regional Committee for Europe 65th session. Tuberculosis action plan for the WHO European Region 2016-2020. Copenhagen: WHO; 20 Aug 2015. Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/283804/65wd17e_Rev1_TBActionPlan_150588_withCover.pdf?ua=1
  4. World Health Organization (WHO). Gear up to End TB. Geneva: WHO; March 2015. Available from: https://www.who.int/gender-equity-rights/knowledge/EndTBadvocacy_brochure/en/
  5. Uplekar M, Weil D, Lönnroth K, Jaramillo E, Lienhardt C, Dias HM, et al. WHO’s new end TB strategy. Lancet. 2015;385(9979):1799-801.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60570-0  PMID: 25814376 
  6. Van Hest R. Capture-recapture methods in surveillance of tuberculosis and other infectious diseases PhD Thesis. Erasmus MC. Rotterdam: University Medical Center Rotterdam. 2007. Available from: https://repub.eur.nl/pub/10506/
  7. Cojocaru C, van Hest NA, Mihaescu T, Davies PD. Completeness of notification of adult tuberculosis in Iasi County, Romania: a capture-recapture analysis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2009;13(9):1094-9. PMID: 19723397 
  8. World Health Organization (WHO). Assessing tuberculosis under-reporting through inventory studies. Geneva: WHO; 2012. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/78073/9789241504942_eng.pdf?sequence=1
  9. Migliori GB, Spanevello A, Ballardini L, Neri M, Gambarini C, Moro ML, et al. Validation of the surveillance system for new cases of tuberculosis in a province of northern Italy. Eur Respir J. 1995;8(8):1252-8.  https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.95.08081252  PMID: 7489786 
  10. Mukerjee AK. Ascertainment of non-respiratory tuberculosis in five boroughs by comparison of multiple data sources. Commun Dis Public Health. 1999;2(2):143-4. PMID: 10402752 
  11. van Hest NA, Smit F, Baars HW, De Vries G, De Haas PE, Westenend PJ, et al. Completeness of notification of tuberculosis in The Netherlands: how reliable is record-linkage and capture-recapture analysis? Epidemiol Infect. 2007;135(6):1021-9.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268806007540  PMID: 17156496 
  12. van Hest NA, Story A, Grant AD, Antoine D, Crofts JP, Watson JM. Record-linkage and capture-recapture analysis to estimate the incidence and completeness of reporting of tuberculosis in England 1999-2002. Epidemiol Infect. 2008;136(12):1606-16.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268808000496  PMID: 18346285 
  13. World Health Organization (WHO). International classification of diseases: 9th revision, basic tabulation list with alphabetic index. Geneva: WHO; 1978. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/39473
  14. World Health Organization (WHO). International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision. Geneva: WHO; Available from: https://icd.who.int/browse10/2010/en
  15. International Working Group for Disease Monitoring and Forecasting. Capture-recapture and multiple-record systems estimation I: History and theoretical development. Am J Epidemiol. 1995;142(10):1047-58. PMID: 7485050 
  16. Fienberg SE. The multiple-recapture census for closed populations and the 2k incomplete contingency table. Biometrika. 1972;59(3):591-603.  https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/59.3.591 
  17. Bishop YMM, Fienberg SE, Holland PW. Discrete Multivariate Analysis. Cambridge: MIT-Press. 1975.
  18. Hook EB, Regal RR. Capture-recapture methods in epidemiology: methods and limitations. Epidemiol Rev. 1995;17(2):243-64.  https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036192  PMID: 8654510 
  19. International Working Group for Disease Monitoring and Forecasting. Capture-recapture and multiple-record systems estimation II: Applications in human diseases. Am J Epidemiol. 1995;142(10):1059-68.  https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117559  PMID: 7485051 
  20. Brenner H. Use and limitations of the capture-recapture method in disease monitoring with two dependent sources. Epidemiology. 1995;6(1):42-8.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00001648-199501000-00009  PMID: 7888444 
  21. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC)/World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe (WHO/Europe). Tuberculosis surveillance and monitoring in Europe 2018 – 2016 data. Stockholm: ECDC; 2018. Available from: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/ecdc-tuberculosis-surveillance-monitoring-Europe-2018-rev1.pdf
  22. World Health Organization (WHO). TB impact measurement. Policy and recommendations for how to assess the epidemiological burden of TB and the impact of TB control. Stop TB Policy Paper no. 2. Geneva: WHO; 2009. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/44231/9789241598828_eng.pdf?sequence=1
  23. Dye C, Bassili A, Bierrenbach AL, Broekmans JF, Chadha VK, Glaziou P, et al. Measuring tuberculosis burden, trends, and the impact of control programmes. Lancet Infect Dis. 2008;8(4):233-43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70291-8  PMID: 18201929 
  24. World Health Organization (WHO). Tuberculosis Prevalence Surveys: a handbook. WHO/HTM/TB/2010.17. Geneva: WHO; 2011. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/44481/9789241548168_eng.pdf?sequence=1
  25. Tocque K, Bellis MA, Beeching NJ, Davies PD. Capture recapture as a method of determining the completeness of tuberculosis notifications. Commun Dis Public Health. 2001;4(2):141-3. PMID: 11525005 
  26. Baussano I, Bugiani M, Gregori D, van Hest R, Borraccino A, Raso R, et al. Undetected burden of tuberculosis in a low-prevalence area. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2006;10(4):415-21. PMID: 16602406 
  27. Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu (RIVM). Tuberculose in Nederland 2015 – Surveillancerapport. [Tuberculosis in the Netherlands 2015 – Surveillance report]. Bilthoven: RIVM; 2016. Dutch. Available from: https://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/rapporten/2016-0140.pdf
  28. European Parliament and Council of the European Union. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). Luxembourg: Official Journal of the European Union. 4 May 2016. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32016R0679&from=EN
  29. van Loenhout-Rooyackers JH, Leufkens HG, Hekster YA, Kalisvaart NA. Pyrazinamide use as a method of estimating under-reporting of tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2001;5(12):1156-60. PMID: 11769775 
  30. Regal RR, Hook EB. Marginal versus conditional versus ‘structural source’ models: a rationale for an alternative to log-linear methods for capture-recapture estimates. Stat Med. 1998;17(1):69-74.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980115)17:1<69::AID-SIM729>3.0.CO;2-Q  PMID: 9463850 
  31. Jones HE, Hickman M, Welton NJ, De Angelis D, Harris RJ, Ades AE. Recapture or precapture? Fallibility of standard capture-recapture methods in the presence of referrals between sources. Am J Epidemiol. 2014;179(11):1383-93.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwu056  PMID: 24727806 
  32. Van Hest NA, Hoebe CJ, Den Boer JW, Vermunt JK, Ijzerman EP, Boersma WG, et al. Incidence and completeness of notification of Legionnaires’ disease in The Netherlands: covariate capture-recapture analysis acknowledging regional differences. Epidemiol Infect. 2008;136(4):540-50.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268807008977  PMID: 17588278 
  33. United Nations (UN). Standard country or area codes for statistical use (M49). Geographic Regions. New York: UN. [Accessed 23 Mar 2020]. Available from: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/methodology/m49/
/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.12.1900568
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Submit comment
Close
Comment moderation successfully completed
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error