The new Eurosurveillance website is almost here.

Eurosurveillance is on the updated list of the Directory of Open Access Journals and in the SHERPA/RoMEO database. Read more here.

On 6 June 2017, the World Health Organization (WHO) published updates to its ‘Essential Medicines List’ (EML). Read more here.

Follow Eurosurveillance on Twitter: @Eurosurveillanc

In this issue

Home Eurosurveillance Edition  2017: Volume 22/ Issue 2 Article 5
Back to Table of Contents
Previous Download (pdf)

Eurosurveillance, Volume 22, Issue 2, 12 January 2017
Research article
Walewska-Zielecka, Religioni, Juszczyk, Wawrzyniak, Czerw, Soszyński, and Fronczak: Anti-hepatitis C virus seroprevalence in the working age population in Poland, 2004 to 2014

+ Author affiliations

Citation style for this article: Walewska-Zielecka B, Religioni U, Juszczyk G, Wawrzyniak ZM, Czerw A, Soszyński P, Fronczak A. Anti-hepatitis C virus seroprevalence in the working age population in Poland, 2004 to 2014. Euro Surveill. 2017;22(2):pii=30441. DOI:

Received:10 November 2015; Accepted:10 October 2016


Liver cirrhosis, liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma are possible long-term consequences of untreated hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection [1-5], which the World Health Organization (WHO) considers as a serious public health concern and one of the major public health priorities [6]. HCV is transmitted mostly by percutaneous exposure to blood [7,8], including intravenous drug injection, which is becoming an important route, especially in developed countries [9,10]. Mother-to-child transmission occurs as well; however, it is relatively uncommon, affecting an estimated 4% of children of HCV-infected mothers [11,12].

In 2005, ca 185 million people in the world, corresponding to approximately 2.8% of the global population, were estimated to be anti-HCV positive [13]. The prevalence of HCV infection ranges from 1.2% to 3.8% in different parts of the world and is highest in central Asia (3.8%), east Asia (3.7%) and North Africa/Middle East (3.6%) [14,15]. In the United States (US), HCV infection prevalence is at 1.6% (2.1% in men and 1.2 % in women) and higher (75% of all cases) in people born between 1945 and 1965 [16]. For this reason, both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) as well as the American Gastroenterology Association (AGA) recommend screening for all individuals born in this period [17,18].

A study from 2014, based on comprehensive literature search anti-HCV prevalence, found the prevalence in Europe to vary from 0.9% in western Europe, through 1.3% in central Europe to 3.3% in eastern Europe [19]. A report from the European Centre for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that in European Union (EU)/European Free Trade Association (EFTA) countries over half of persons with HCV infection in 2006 are in the 25–44 year age group and overall men (64.4%) are more affected than women (35.6%) [20]. From the 1990s up to 2007, new infections appeared to decline in western Europe, while they increased in eastern Europe, possibly due to rising numbers of people who inject drugs (PWIDs) in the east and effective needle sharing programmes in the west [15,21,22].

In Poland, newly diagnosed HCV infections are registered and monitored by the National Institute of Public Health since 1997 [23,24]. The data are based on formal notifications from local Sanitary Inspectorates of newly diagnosed HCV infections according to the national case definition [25]. A regulation of the Minister of Health of 20 September 2012 made anti-HCV tests mandatory in all pregnant women from that year onwards [26].

The latest estimates for HCV infection incidence in the country are 7.99 newly diagnosed cases per 100,000 inhabitants in 2014 [27] and, preliminarily, 11.14 newly diagnosed cases per 100,000 inhabitants in 2015 [24]. HCV infection incidence is much higher in the cities (10.7/100,000 inhabitants) than in rural areas (4.82/100,000 inhabitants) and in men (8.58/100,000) than in women (7.44/100,000) [27]. As acute HCV infection is usually asymptomatic, 86% of infected people in Poland are estimated to be unaware of their infection [14,28]. Therefore increasing the diagnosis rate of infected persons is important [2], not only to more timely treat hepatitis C, but also to stop further spread of HCV.

Research on HCV prevalence in Poland has so far mainly focused on specific groups (healthcare workers, patients, volunteers, students, blood donors, pregnant women) or on selected areas of Poland [28-36]. There are no epidemiological data for the prevalence of HCV in the general working age population over the whole country, especially based on a large population sample. The purpose of this study is therefore to estimate the anti-HCV seroprevalence in the working age population of Poland, using real-life data obtained from medical records of countrywide outpatient clinics, and accordingly formulate recommendations on age-related HCV infection screening.


Data source

Data were obtained in February 2015 from electronic medical records of a large countrywide outpatient clinic network operating mainly in big cities (with more than 300,000 inhabitants) representing the capitals of 11 of the 16 regions in Poland (Bialystok, Bydgoszcz, Gdańsk, Katowice, Krakow, Lublin, Łódź, Poznań, Szczecin, Warszawa, Wrocław). The clinics provide medical services predominantly to urban and suburban inhabitants with a negligible share of patients from rural areas. It is estimated that study clinics are accessible to a total of 6 million city dwellers (15% of the Polish population).

Testing for hepatitis C virus antibodies

In order to estimate the seroprevalence in the study population, only the results of anti-HCV were analysed. Anti-HCV in serum was detected by electrochemiluminescence (Roche, ECLIA) and the detection method did not change throughout the study period. All patients with positive results had been referred to special infectious disease clinical departments in order to undergo confirmatory HCV RNA tests if necessary; therefore, those results were not available in the anonymous dataset. Anti-HCV true positive results were not confirmed by immunoblotting. Such a limited approach without final confirmation of anti-HCV positivity was applied on the basis of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) recommendations, stating that immunoblotting is not recommended to distinguish false positive and true positive anti-HCV result. In order to confirm current viraemia, an HCV RNA test ought to be performed, however this was not the aim of this study [37].

The clinical sensitivity of the test used to detect anti-HCV is estimated at 100% (95% confidence interval (CI): 99.61–100%), the specificity at 99.62% (95%CI: 99.71%–99.92%) [38].

Study population

The total population aimed to be investigated in the study consisted of patients who had been tested for anti-HCV at least once in the period from 2004 to 2014. The study group was extracted from the pool of all medical records of 1.5 million individuals who had been consulted by any doctor in this period. Available records included information on: unique patient number, sex, date of test, age at the date of testing, diagnosis related to the test referral and test result. Only the latest result of testing was included into the study pool, which finally comprised 61,805 single test results of unique patients. The study group was limited to working age population representatives, aged 15–64 years. The working age population was defined according to the definition of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) [39]. In Poland, the working age population consists of 25 million people including 11.768 million women and 12.971 million men.

Data analysis

Analysis of the population tested for hepatitis C virus antibodies

The total population tested for anti-HCV was divided into 10-year age groups stratified by sex and the year of testing for time analysis. In each subgroup, the total number of patients tested was used as a denominator.

Analysis of the population testing positive for hepatitis C virus antibodies

The number of persons with a positive result for HCV antibody were available each year along with demographical data (sex and age). The rate of total positive tests was calculated and stratified by sex and age. The analyses by age group were conducted by comparing the number of patients, the number of tests and the number of positive/negative results for HCV antibody. Two classifications according to age were used. In the first classification the study population age range was split into 10 year-age groups. In the second classification, since the US data indicated a higher prevalence of HCV in people now aged 50 to 70 years [16], the percentage of positive anti-HCV test results was accordingly analysed in age groups 15 to 49 years and over 50 years.

The mean rates of positive patients were analysed over time by regression analysis and stratified by sex.

Analysis of testing and positive tests by referral group

A number of referrals for anti-HCV test (n = 36,356) had preliminary diagnosis information (according to ICD-10 coding) [40]. We compiled those diagnoses into specific groups for further analyses (Table 1). Both 3-digital and 5-digital ICD-10 codes were aggregated.

Table 1

Aggregated ICD-10 diagnoses accompanying referrals for testing hepatitis C virus antibodies, Poland, 2004–2014 (n = 36,356 patients)

Diagnosis ICD-10- codes Group
Pregnancy and pregnancy-related conditions O20, O24, O26, Z32, Z34, Z35 1
Preventive consultations of generally healthy persons Z00, Z01, Z02, Z10, Z24, Z29, Z31, Z71, Z76 2
Various symptoms and signs R10, R53, R68, R69, R72, R79, Z03, Z04 3
Fatty liver disease K76, E78 4
Hypertransaminasaemia R74 5
Others Other than the above 6

Statistical methods

Data were analysed using STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 12, ( StatSoft, Inc. (2014) US, to calculate the incidence of newly diagnosed cases per year, and the prevalence in the entire examined population. The independent-sample t-test was used for normally distributed variables, and the nonparametric Mann–Whitney U test was used for not normally distributed parameters. Significance was set at p < 0.05. Using linear regression analysis, the trend of the number of the incidence as a function of time (years) was calculated and the R-square value evaluated the goodness of fit of the regression.


Characteristics of the study population

Overall characteristics

A total of 61,805 single patient records were considered in the study, spanning the period from 2004 to 2014 (Table 2). Men (n = 19,531) accounted for 31.6% of the total study group. The overall average age of patients was 34.4 years (standard deviation (SD): 8.6). The average age of men was 36.5 years (SD: 9.6). The average age of women was 33.4 years (SD: 7.9) (Table 3).

Table 2

Annual numbers of patients tested for hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibodies and proportions testing positive, stratified by sex, Poland, 2004–2014 (n = 61,805 patients)

Year All patients Women Men P value
Number of
anti-HCV tests
Number of positive results Percentage of positive results Number of
anti-HCV tests
Number of positive results Percentage of positive results Number of
anti-HCV tests
Number of positive results Percentage of positive results
2004 815 26 3.2% 410 14 3.4% 405 12 3.0% 0.7143
2005 1,366 32 2.3% 766 14 1.8% 600 18 3.0% 0.1553
2006 1,210 29 2.4% 650 13 2.0% 560 16 2.9% 0.3314
2007 1,761 43 2.4% 961 26 2.7% 800 17 2.1% 0.4322
2008 3,033 47 1.6% 1,648 25 1.5% 1,385 22 1.6% 0.8740
2009 4,263 75 1.8% 2,477 44 1.8% 1,786 31 1.7% 0.9208
2010 5,250 116 2.2% 3,243 57 1.8% 2,007 59 2.9% 0.0075
2011 7,378 149 2.0% 4,970 86 1.7% 2,408 63 2.6% 0.0180
2012 9,527 133 1.4% 6,730 78 1.2% 2,797 55 2.0% 0.0059
2013 12,239 141 1.2% 8,799 88 1.0% 3,440 53 1.5% 0.0216
2014 14,963 166 1.1% 11,620 113 1.0% 3,343 53 1.6% 0.0090
Total 61,805 957 1.5% 42,274 558 1.3% 19,531 399 2.0% 0.0001

Table 3

Characteristics of the study population and that testing positive for hepatitis C virus antibodies, Poland, 2004–2014 (n = 61,805 patients)

Participants Sex Mean age Standard deviation Number of persons Column percentage
Study participants F 33.4 7.9 42,274 68.4%
M 36.5 9.6 19,531 31.6%
Total 34.4 8.6 61,805 100.0%
Study participants testing positive F 36.0 9.8 558 58.3%
M 37.8 9.7 399 41.7%
Total 36.8 9.8 957 100.0%

F: female; M: male.

Analysis by age group

The most represented age group in terms of number of individuals was the one comprising 25 to 34 year-olds (n = 35,047 patients; 56.7%) and the least numerous group comprised persons over 55 years (n = 2,626 patients; 4.2%) (Table 4).

Table 4

Results of anti-hepatitis C virus tests stratified by patient age groups and sex in a study estimating hepatitis C seroprevalence, Poland, 2004–2014 (n = 61,805 patients)

Age group
All patients Women Men P value
Number Number testing positive for HCV antibodies Percentage testing positive for HCV antibodies Number Number testing positive for HCV antibodies Percentage testing positive for HCV antibodies Number Number testing positive for HCV antibodies Percentage testing positive for HCV antibodies
15–24 3,411 52 1.5% 2,234 33 1.5% 1,177 19 1.6% 0.7561
25–34 35,047 436 1.2% 26,632 285 1.1% 8,416 151 1.8% 0.0001
35–44 15,614 254 1.6% 9,444 132 1.4% 6,170 122 2.0% 0.0051
45–54 5,107 147 2.9% 2,591 65 2.6% 2,536 82 3.2% 0.1318
55–64 2,626 68 2.6% 1,394 43 3.2% 1,232 25 2.0% 0.0893
15–49 56,921 825 1.4% 39,676 480 1.2% 17,245 345 2.0% 0.0001
50–64 4,884 132 2.7% 2,598 78 3.0% 2,286 54 2.4% 0.1687
Total 61,805 957 1.5% 42,274 558 1.3% 19,531 399 2.0% 0.0001
Mean age in years (SD) 34.4 (8.6) 36.8 (9.8) 100.0% 33.4 (7.9) 36.0 (9.8) 58.3% 36.5 (9.6) 37.8 (9.7) 41.7% 0.0001

HCV: hepatitis C virus; SD: standard deviation.

Time analysis of testing practices

The number of patients examined for anti-HCV increased steadily with time, from 815 patients in 2004, to 14,963 in 2014 (Table 2).

The percentage of all medical-facility-patients tested yearly increased from 0.9% (815/88,177) in 2004 to 4.0% (14,963/376,637) in 2014. Data showed a growing proportion of women being examined. In 2004, a similar number of men and women underwent anti-HCV tests (50.3% (410/815) of women and 49.7% (405/815) of men), whereas in 2014, women accounted for 79.1% (11,620/14,693). This increase may reflect legal requirements for prenatal care during pregnancy in Poland, with HCV testing becoming compulsory for pregnant women from 2012 onwards (Table 5) [26].

Table 5

Proportions of patients undergoing anti-hepatitis C virus tests, Poland, 2004–2014 (n = 61,805 patients)

Year All patients Women Men
Number Number tested Percentage tested Number Number tested Percentage tested Number Number tested Percentage tested
2004 88,177 815 0.9% 45,417 410 0.9% 42,760 405 0.9%
2005 106,464 1,366 1.3% 54,484 766 1.4% 51,980 600 1.2%
2006 127,195 1,210 1.0% 64,518 650 1.0% 62,677 560 0.9%
2007 157,238 1,761 1.1% 80,478 961 1.2% 76,760 800 1.0%
2008 200,031 3,033 1.5% 103,257 1,648 1.6% 96,774 1,385 1.4%
2009 219,905 4,263 1.9% 114,630 2,477 2.2% 105,275 1,786 1.7%
2010 240,307 5,250 2.2% 125,217 3,243 2.6% 115,090 2,007 1.7%
2011 269,140 7,378 2.7% 139,882 4,970 3.6% 129,258 2,408 1.9%
2012 303,813 9,527 3.1% 157,812 6,730 4.3% 146,001 2,797 1.9%
2013 335,526 12,239 3.6% 173,902 8,799 5.1% 161,624 3,440 2.1%
2014 376,637 14,963 4.0% 195,787 11,620 5.9% 180,850 3,343 1.8%
Total 2,424,433 61,805 2.5% 1,255,384 42,274 3.4% 1,169,049 19,531 1.7%

Characteristics of the population testing positive for hepatitis C virus antibodies

Overall characteristics

Throughout the analysed period, 1.5% patients (957/61,805) undergoing anti-HCV examination tested positive. Averaged positive results for women and men were 1.3% (558/42,274) and 2.0% (399/19,531) respectively (p = 0.0001). The average age of all anti-HCV positive patients was 36.8 years (SD: 9.8). The average age of anti-HCV positive women was 36.0 years (SD: 9.8), and the average age of men with positive test results was 37.8 years (SD: 9.7).

Analysis by age group

Most anti-HCV positive cases occurred in patients aged 45–54 years (2.9% of tested patients 147/5,107) and in patients older than 55 years (2.6% of tested patients 68/2,626). The lowest proportions of positive test results were noted in the youngest patients: 1.2% (436/35,047) among patients aged 25 to 34 years and 1.5% (52/3,411) among patients aged 15 to 24 years.

In the group of tested women, among those older than 25 years, the percentage of positive anti-HCV test results increased with age, being lowest among women aged 25–34 years (1.1%; 285/26,632) and 35–44 years (1.4%; 132/9,444), and highest for women aged over 55 years (3.2%; 43/1,394). For the youngest group comprising 15 to 24 year-olds, the value 1.5% (33/2,234) was similar to that of the group of 35 to 44 year-olds (1.4%; 132/9,444). In the group of tested men, the smallest proportion of infections was found in the 15 to 24 years age group (1.6%; 19/1,177) and increased with age up to 3.2% (82/2,536) in the age group including 45 to 54 year-olds. For individuals over 55 years the value was similar (2.0%; 25/1,232) to that of the age group with 35 to 44 year-olds (2.0%; 122/6,170) (Table 3).

Because a higher prevalence of HCV was reported in 50 to 70 year-olds in the US [16], the percentage of positive anti-HCV test results was also analysed in age groups 15 to 49 years (representing 92.1% of those tested 56,921/61,805) and over 50 years (7.9%; 4,884/61,805). A higher percentage of anti-HCV positive patients was found in those aged over 50 years (2.7%; 132/4,884) compared with younger participants (1.4%; 825/56,921) (p < 0.0001). This percentage was higher for both women and men aged over 50 years, with, in women 3.0% (78/2,598) vs 1.2% (480/39,676) in those aged under 50 years (p = 0.0001) and, in men, 2.4% (54/2,286) vs 2.0% (345/17,245) in those less than 50 years-old (p = 0.2507).

Time analysis of patients testing positive for hepatitis C virus antibodies

An analysis of the data in the years 2004 to 2014 suggests a downward trend for the proportion of positive anti-HCV results (mean positive anti-HCV = -0.0017 × year + 3.3715; R2 = 0.7558) (Figure).


Proportions of hepatitis C virus antibody positive tests among the study population, stratified by year and sex, Poland, 2004–2014 (n = 61,805 patients)


F: female; M: male; HCV: hepatitis C virus.

In 2004, positive results were noted in 3.2% (26/815) of patients examined for anti-HCV, but in 2014 the percentage of patients with a positive result stood at 1.1% (166/14,693). Similar tendencies were observed in both women and men. In 2004, the percentage of anti-HCV positive results in women was 3.4% (14/410), and in men 3.0% (12/405) (p > 0.05), whereas in 2014, anti-HCV positive results were noted among 1.0% (113/11,620) of women and 1.6% (53/3,343) of men (p = 0.0090).

Referral group testing and test results

We analysed the diagnoses ascribed to each anti-HCV test referral. The predominant reason for anti-HCV testing was pregnancy and pregnancy-related conditions – 44.4% (16,130/36,356) –, followed by preventive testing of otherwise healthy people (occupational health or preventive screening) with 17.8% (6,456/36,356). Various symptoms and signs were the reason for testing in 14.2% of patients (5,151/36,356), fatty liver disease in 3.1% (1,115/36,356) and elevated alanine transaminase levels (ALT) as single diagnosis in 3.0% (1,093/36,356) (Table 6). Only 0.8% (122/16,130) of patients with a diagnosis of pregnancy and pregnancy-related conditions were anti-HCV positive. Preventive action and anti-HCV testing revealed positive results in 1.2% (75/6,456), of patients, while 2.1% (108/5,151) of patients with various symptoms and signs were anti-HCV positive, as well as 3.4% (23/1,115) of patients with a diagnosis of fatty liver disease and 3.7% (25/1,093) of people with elevated ALT (Table 6).

Table 6

Primary diagnoses resulting in the referral for anti-hepatitis C virus tests, Poland, 2004–2014 (n = 36,356 patients)

LBID012_Diagnosis Number of patients tested Number of patients with positive results Proportion of positive patients Proportion of positive
Proportion of positive men Proportion positive in column Proportion of diagnosed patients
Pregnancy and pregnancy related conditions 16,130 122 0.8% 0.8% NA 25.4% 44.4%
Preventive consultations of generally healthy personsa 6,456 75 1.2% 0.7% 1.0% 15.6% 17.8%
Various symptoms and signs 5,151 108 2.1% 1.0% 2.1% 22.5% 14.2%
Hypertransaminasaemiab 1,093 25 3.7% 1.1% 1.7% 5.2% 3.0%
Fatty liver disease 1,115 23 3.4% 0.8% 1.7% 4.8% 3.1%
Othersc 6,411 127 1.5% 0.9% 2.6% 26.5% 17.6%
Total 36,356 480 1.1% 0.8% 1.9% 100.00% 100.0%

NA: not applicable.

a Spontaneous or obligatory health check-ups.

b Excluding people with elevated transaminase level as a reason of additional anti-HCV test.

c Most often before surgical procedures.


Our study presents an evaluation of anti-HCV prevalence in a large country-wide sample of (sub)urban working-age Polish people between 2004 and 2014. Data from electronic medical records of ambulatory patients visiting doctors due to different conditions, including prophylactic and screening reasons, were analysed. The overall anti-HCV prevalence in our study was 1.5%. Similar to previous studies [29,30] and studies from other countries [41-43], anti-HCV positivity was significantly more frequent in men than women (2.0% vs 1.3% respectively; p = 0.0001).

We also found that in contrast to younger age groups (15 to 49 years), anti-HCV prevalence in people aged between 50 and 64 years was higher (2.7% vs 1.4%; p < 0.0001), and surprisingly more frequent in women (3.0%) than men (2.4%) although, this difference was not statistically significant. Higher HCV infection prevalence in people born before 1965 has also been observed in the US [16], therefore, the recommendation of CDC and AGA to screen people born before 1965 [17,18] might also be justified in Poland and could be implemented as part of primary healthcare. According to the authors’ own research on 16,130 pregnant women, the prevalence of HCV in this group was only 0.8% which is close to the European average (1%) [44]. Low anti-HCV prevalence in pregnant women and high prevalence in people of post-reproductive age might be a subject of debate in terms of allocating effective financial resources for HCV screening in these two groups.

To our knowledge, our study constitutes one of the currently largest performed in the Polish population of working age. Indeed, although previous studies in the country have attempted to assess HCV prevalence, these have either been conducted either some time ago, or have been mainly based on small samples and/or on selected population groups – pregnant women, students, blood donors or deceased organ donors – with, in some cases, only a single district or town in the country considered [28,29,31-35,45]. For example, the study by Bielawski et al. in 1999, which is still the point of reference for many epidemiological studies on HCV infection in Poland, was conducted on a group of 2,561 volunteers enrolled by a laboratory in Gdansk in response to press advertisements. It estimated the overall HCV infection prevalence at 1.9% [29], with 2.3% of men versus 1.7% of women seropositive for hepatitis C virus antibodies. Limitations of this study were however the restricted geographical area and the group chosen to be tested (volunteer bias) [29]. Since then, larger studies have been performed, an important one being that of Seyfried et al., where 4,233,119 blood donors were screened between 1994 and 2003. Anti-HCV prevalence in this group was found to be on average 0.5% [36]. The most recent study by Flisiak et al. in 2011, which was performed from 2009 to 2010 in 26,057 Polish adults (healthcare workers and hospital patients), presented anti-HCV prevalence in healthcare workers at 1.4%, whereas in ambulatory patients of different general practice and specialist outpatient clinics it was 1.9% [30]. Here we investigate 61,805 people of working-age over the whole country between 2004 and 2014 and find a prevalence of 1.5%, similar to what is currently estimated for central Europe (1.3%) [19].

Hepatitis C infection has been registered as a distinct disease entity in Poland since 1997. Until 2004, the annual number of newly diagnosed cases of HCV infection, logged by the National Institute of Hygiene, did not exceed 2,000. In the years 2005 and 2006 the number increased to 3,000 (2,997 and 2,949 in each year respectively), but this increase was most likely caused by the modification of disease reporting methods. In the following years, the number of newly diagnosed cases decreased steadily (2,753 in 2007, 2,353 in 2008). Since 2009 however, another upward trend can be observed. The number of reported cases of new HCV infections in Poland accumulated to 1,891 in 2009, 2,178 in 2010, 2,189 in 2011, 2,265 in 2012 and increased to 2,600 cases in 2013 [46].

Our analysis on the proportions of persons with HCV antibodies in working age people from 2004 to 2014 does not find such an increasing trend in the latest years of the study. Instead we find a higher proportion of patients with HCV antibodies in the first year of the study compared to the end of the analysed period (3.2% in 2004 vs 1.1% in 2014). This could be due to a general drop in HCV infections in working age people, but also to a change of indication for testing. Indeed, the most common indication for evaluating HCV serological status in the early years of the study was elevated serum ALT, which per se is regarded as a laboratory manifestation of liver injury. With the introduction of obligatory anti-HCV testing in all pregnant women from 2012 onwards, the proportion of anti-HCV positive persons dropped significantly, possibly coming closer to the actual prevalence of HCV infection in this relatively young and overall healthy group.

This study presents however a number of limitations. First, the prevalence of HCV infection is known to vary according to risk groups. The study by Flisiak et al. on 17,930 persons found that significant factors of HCV infection in Poland are more than three hospitalisations during a life time (odds ratio (OR) = 1.8), blood transfusion before 1992 (OR = 2.9) and intravenous drug use (OR = 6.2) [30]. Transmission of HCV via intravenous drug use has been increasingly observed and in 2007, 10 of 16 million of PWID worldwide were estimated to be HCV positive. The number of active PWIDs in the EU is estimated at ca 1 million [10]. In Poland, 70% of PWIDs are infected with HCV, predominantly men under 45 years of age [47]. In our study, we had no access to individual medical records; therefore, intravenous drug use could not be accounted for. Moreover, we did not have information on patients’ profession either, so we could not evaluate any possible occupational risk.

Second, our study only analysed HCV antibody prevalence, and western blot tests were not performed. Thus results do not distinguish between current infections and probable infections in the past (resolved infection). A final diagnosis of current HCV infection requires the finding of HCV RNA in serum samples by RT-PCR. We had no access to HCV RNA results that were stored in the form of scans and required patients’ consent for access. The results of this study can therefore not be compared with any studies using the EU HCV case definition [48]. A Polish study in 2011 showed that only 31% of those with HCV antibodies were also positive for HCV RNA by RT-PCR [30]. Moreover the sensitivity of the electrochemiluminescence (Roche, ECLIA) assay used in this study is very high, so specificity will be lower, which may result in false positive results. Taking these points into consideration, the prevalence of current HCV infection in the Polish urban working population is likely to be lower than 1.5%. Further studies on positive anti-HCV test results and HCV RNA detection may reveal if HCV infection is resolved more frequently than has been presumed up to now (ca 30% of cases being resolved [49]).

Finally, although our study was conducted on a large number of patients, another important limitation was the inclusion of only people living in big cities and their suburbs. One risk factor for HCV infection is the use of medical care, which is less frequent in inhabitants of rural areas. Accordingly, anti-HCV prevalence in rural areas has been shown to be lower than in urban areas [27,50]. Therefore our results cannot be extrapolated to the whole population and it can be assumed that the prevalence of HCV infection among people of working age in the country may be lower than 1.5%.


There is evidence that an improvement of diagnostics and treatment effectiveness may significantly reduce the burden of HCV infections in Poland [5,51]. A study using a modelling approach estimated that, until 2030, the HCV prevalence is projected to decrease by 5%. In contrast, an increase in the number of treated patients to 15,000 yearly would reduce the number of total infections by 90% until 2030, which would also contribute to a decrease of HCV-mortality by 80% [49]. The results obtained in this study suggest that the proportion of people infected with HCV in Poland in the working population is decreasing, which may be a consequence of increasing social awareness, including preventative activities after or before exposure to blood-borne infections. Moreover, a higher prevalence of anti-HCV was found in the population of post-reproductive age. We therefore recommend screening HCV tests mainly in individuals over 45 years-old. Examining healthy and young people should not be carried out as part of screening, however testing may be recommended to individuals who are subjected to risk factors. The continuous monitoring of HCV prevalence and incidence in Poland is important to estimate the resources needed for screening and treatment as well as their costs. Knowing the age groups at higher risk for infection will help to establish recommendations for more effective detection of cases of HCV infection, which in turn is also crucial to reduce further transmission.


The Authors would like to acknowledge and expert IT help of Mrs Irena Zawalska.

Conflict of interest

Bożena Walewska-Zielecka and Piotr Soszyński are current employees of Medicover Sp. z o.o.

Authors’ contributions

Conception or design of the work: BWZ, GJ; data acquisition: BWZ; data analysis: ZW, BWZ, GJ, UR, PS; interpretation of the data for the work: BWZ, UR, GJ, ZW, AC, PS, AF; drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content: All; approval of manuscript submission: All.


  1. Stanaway JD, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, Fitzmaurice C, Vos T, Abubakar I,  et al.  The global burden of viral hepatitis from 1990 to 2013: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2016;388(10049):1081-8. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30579-7 PMID: 27394647

  2. Wedemeyer H, Dore GJ, Ward JW. Estimates on HCV disease burden worldwide - filling the gaps.J Viral Hepat. 2015;22(Suppl 1):1-5. DOI: 10.1111/jvh.12371 PMID: 25560838

  3. Poynard T, Ratziu V, Benmanov Y, Di Martino V, Bedossa P, Opolon P. Fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C: detection and significance.Semin Liver Dis. 2000;20(1):47-55. DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-9258 PMID: 10895431

  4. Poynard T, Bedossa P, Opolon P, for the OBSVIRC, METAVIR, CLINIVIR and DOSVIRC groups. Natural history of liver fibrosis progression in patients with chronic hepatitis C.Lancet. 1997;349(9055):825-32. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)07642-8 PMID: 9121257

  5. Razavi H, Waked I, Sarrazin C, Myers RP, Idilman R, Calinas F,  et al.  The present and future disease burden of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection with today’s treatment paradigm. J Viral Hepat. 2014;21(Suppl 1):34-59. DOI: 10.1111/jvh.12248 PMID: 24713005

  6. World Health Organization (WHO). Prevention and Control of Viral Hepatitis Infection: Framework for Global Action. Geneva: WHO; 2012. Available from:

  7. Suzuki K, Mizokami M, Lau JY, Mizoguchi N, Kato K, Mizuno Y,  et al.  Confirmation of hepatitis C virus transmission through needlestick accidents by molecular evolutionary analysis. J Infect Dis. 1994;170(6):1575-8. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/170.6.1575 PMID: 7527827

  8. Foberg U, Ekermo B, Widell A, Mathiesen U, Fryden A. Hepatitis C virus transmission, 1988-1991, via blood components from donors subsequently found to be anti-HCV-positive.Scand J Infect Dis. 1996;28(1):21-6. DOI: 10.3109/00365549609027144 PMID: 9122627

  9. Verbaan H, Andersson K, Eriksson S. Intravenous drug abuse--the major route of hepatitis C virus transmission among alcohol-dependent individuals?Scand J Gastroenterol. 1993;28(8):714-8. DOI: 10.3109/00365529309098279 PMID: 7692588

  10. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA). EMCDDA 2010 Selected Issue-Trends in Injecting Drug use in Europe European Union. Annual Report. Selected Issues/European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. EMCDDA: Lisbon; 2010. pp.22.

  11. Mazza C, Ravaggi A, Rodella A, Padula D, Duse M, Lomini M,  et al.  Prospective study of mother-to-infant transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. J Med Virol. 1998;54(1):12-9. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9071(199801)54:1<12::AID-JMV3>3.0.CO;2-S PMID: 9443104

  12. Mast EE, Hwang LY, Seto DS, Nolte FS, Nainan OV, Wurtzel H,  et al.  Risk factors for perinatal transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) and the natural history of HCV infection acquired in infancy. J Infect Dis. 2005;192(11):1880-9. DOI: 10.1086/497701 PMID: 16267758

  13. Mohd Hanafiah K, Groeger J, Flaxman AD, Wiersma ST. Global epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection: new estimates of age-specific antibody to HCV seroprevalence.Hepatology. 2013;57(4):1333-42. DOI: 10.1002/hep.26141 PMID: 23172780

  14. Wei L, Lok AS. Impact of new hepatitis C treatments in different regions of the world. Gastroenterology. 2014;146(5):1145-1150.e 4. PMID: 24662488

  15. World Health Organization (WHO). Guidelines for the screening, care and treatment of persons with hepatitis C infection. Geneva: WHO; April 2014.

  16. Pawlotsky JM. New hepatitis C therapies: the toolbox, strategies, and challenges.Gastroenterology. 2014;146(5):1176-92. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.03.003 PMID: 24631495

  17. Smith BD, Morgan RL, Beckett GA, Falck-Ytter Y, Holtzman D, Teo CG,  et al. . Recommendations for the identification of chronic hepatitis C virus infection among persons born during 1945-1965.MMWR Recomm Rep. 2012;61(RR-4):1-32.PMID: 22895429

  18. Hepatitis C Task Force, Boldt MD, Brill JV, Davis GL, Gordon SC, Kim AY,  et al.  Hepatitis C screening: summary of recommendations from the clinical decision tool. Gastroenterology. 2013;145(5):1146-9. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.09.007 PMID: 24139703

  19. Gower E, Estes C, Blach S, Razavi-Shearer K, Razavi H. Global epidemiology and genotype distribution of the hepatitis C virus infection.J Hepatol. 2014;61(1) Suppl;S45-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.07.027 PMID: 25086286

  20. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Annual Epidemiological Report on Communicable Diseases in Europe 2008. Stockholm: ECDC; 2008. Available from:

  21. Cornberg M, Razavi HA, Alberti A, Bernasconi E, Buti M, Cooper C,  et al.  A systematic review of hepatitis C virus epidemiology in Europe, Canada and Israel. Liver Int. 2011;31(Suppl 2):30-60. DOI: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2011.02539.x PMID: 21651702

  22. Esteban JI, Sauleda S, Quer J. The changing epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection in Europe.J Hepatol. 2008;48(1):148-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2007.07.033 PMID: 18022726

  23. Meldunek roczny 1997 o zachorowaniach na choroby zakazne, zatruciach i zakazeniach szpitalnych zgłoszonych. [Annual report on the incidence of infectious diseases, poisonings and hospital infections reported in 1997]. Warsaw: National Institute of Hygiene, Scientific Research Institute of the Ministry of Health and Social Welfare Department of Epidemiology and The Ministry of Health and Social Welfare Department of Public Health; 1997. Polish. Available from:

  24. Infectious diseases and poisonings in Poland in 2015. Warsaw: National Institute of Public Health – National Institute of Hygiene – Department of Epidemiology and Chief Sanitary Inspectorate – Department for Communicable Disease and Infection Prevention and Control; 2016. Available from:

  25. Narodowego Instytutu Zdrowia Publicznego - Państwowego Zakładu Higieny (NIPH-PZH). [Infectious diseases case definitions for the purpose of epidemiological surveillance]. Draft (3). Warszawa: Division of Epidemiology at NIPH-PZH; Jan 2014. Available from:

  26. Regulation of the Minister of Health of 20 September 2012 on the standards of medical management and procedures during provision of perinatal health care to women during physiological pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium, and neonatal care. Journal of Laws. 2012; item 1100.

  27. Infectious diseases and poisonings in Poland in 2014. Warsaw: National Institute of Public Health – National Institute of Hygiene – Department of Epidemiology and Chief Sanitary Inspectorate – Department for Communicable Disease and Infection Prevention and Control; 2015. page 97. Available from:

  28. Stepień M, Rosińska M. Badania rozpowszechnienia HCV w Polsce--gdzie jesteśmy? [Studies on HCV infection prevalence in Poland--where are we?].Przegl Epidemiol. 2011;65(1):15-20.PMID: 21735830

  29. Bielawski K, Wlasiuk M, Truskolawska M, Falkiewicz B. HCV infection in Poland.Arch Med Res. 2000;31(5):532-5. DOI: 10.1016/S0188-4409(00)00100-4 PMID: 11179591

  30. Flisiak R, Halota W, Horban A, Juszczyk J, Pawlowska M, Simon K. Prevalence and risk factors of HCV infection in Poland.Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;23(12):1213-7. DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32834d173c PMID: 22002000

  31. Pszenny A, Hreńczuk M, Czerwiński J, Danielewicz R, Małkowski P. HBV and HCV infections among deceased organ donors in Poland.Probl Hig Epidemiol.2012;93(3):579-85.

  32. Chlabicz S, Bonifatiuk I, Radziwon P. Prevalence of hepatitis C virus antibodies among blood donors in north-eastern Poland.Hepatol Res. 2005;33(3):206-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.hepres.2005.09.001 PMID: 16266823

  33. Ganczak M, Korzeń M, Szych Z. Seroprevalence of hepatitis C virus infection among surgical nurses, their patients and blood donation candidates in Poland.J Hosp Infect. 2012;82(4):266-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2012.08.021 PMID: 23110996

  34. Zagożdżon P, Parszuto J, Raj A, Całus-Kania D, Korczak A, Ejsmont J. Czestość wystepowania i czynniki ryzyka zakazenia HCV wśród pracowników ochrony zdrowia w województwie pomorskim. [Prevalence and risk factors of chronic hepatitis C virus infection among health-care workers in Pomeranian voivodeship].Przegl Epidemiol. 2009;63(1):39-43.PMID: 19522224

  35. Ślusarczyk J, Małkowski P, Bobilewicz D, Juszczyk G. Cross-sectional, anonymous screening for asymptomatic HCV infection, immunity to HBV, and occult HBV infection among health care workers in Warsaw, Poland.Przegl Epidemiol. 2012;66(3):445-51.PMID: 23230715

  36. Seyfried H, Brojer E, Grabarczyk P, Rosińska M, Gronowska A, Letowska M, Viral Study Group of Regional Blood Transfusion Centers. Analizaczestości wykrywania markerów zakazenia wirusem zapalenia watroby typu C (HCV) u polskich dawców krwi w latach 1994-2003. [Prevalence of hepatitis C virus markers in Polish blood donors in 1994-2003].Przegl Epidemiol. 2005;59(4):807-14.PMID: 16729421

  37. European Association for Study of Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatitis C virus infection. J Hepatol. 2014;60(2):392-420.

  38. Esteban JI, van Helden J, Alborino F, Bürgisser P, Cellerai C, Pantaleo G,  et al.  Multicenter evaluation of the Elecsys® anti-HCV II assay for the diagnosis of hepatitis C virus infection. J Med Virol. 2013;85(8):1362-8. DOI: 10.1002/jmv.23536 PMID: 23765774

  39. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Working age population (indicator). Paris: OECD; 2016. doi: DOI: 10.1787/d339918b-en . [Accessed on 19 July 2016]. Available from:

  40. World Health Organization (WHO). International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision. Geneva: WHO; 2016. [Accessed 11 Jan 2017]. Available from:

  41. Umemura T, Ichijo T, Yoshizawa K, Tanaka E, Kiyosawa K. Epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma in Japan.J Gastroenterol. 2009;44(19) Suppl 19;102-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00535-008-2251-0 PMID: 19148802

  42. Meffre C, Le Strat Y, Delarocque-Astagneau E, Dubois F, Antona D, Lemasson JM,  et al.  Prevalence of hepatitis B and hepatitis C virus infections in France in 2004: social factors are important predictors after adjusting for known risk factors. J Med Virol. 2010;82(4):546-55. DOI: 10.1002/jmv.21734 PMID: 20166185

  43. Bruggmann P, Berg T, Øvrehus AL, Moreno C, Brandão Mello CE, Roudot-Thoraval F,  et al.  Historical epidemiology of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in selected countries. J Viral Hepat. 2014;21(Suppl 1):5-33. DOI: 10.1111/jvh.12247 PMID: 24713004

  44. Cornberg M, Razavi HA, Alberti A, Bernasconi E, Buti M, Cooper C,  et al.  A systematic review of hepatitis C virus epidemiology in Europe, Canada and Israel. Liver Int. 2011;31(Suppl 2):30-60. DOI: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2011.02539.x PMID: 21651702

  45. Aniszewska M, Kowalik-Mikołajewska B, Pokorska-Lis M, Kalinowska M, Cianciara J, Marczyrńska M. Czestość wystepowania przeciwciał anty-HCV u kobiet ciezarnych. Analiza czynników ryzyka zakazenia HCV. [Seroprevalence of anti-HCV in pregnant women. Risk factors of HCV infection]. Przegl Epidemiol. 2009;63(2):293-8.PMID: 19799264

  46. Chief Sanitary Inspectorate (GIS). State sanitary condition in 2013. Warsaw: GIS; 2014.

  47. Panasiuk A, Flisiak R, Mozer-Lisewska I, Adamek A, Tyczyno M, Halota W,  et al.  Distribution of HCV genotypes in Poland. Przegl Epidemiol. 2013;67(1):11-6, 99-103.PMID: 23745369

  48. European Commission. Commission Implementing Decision of 8 August 2012 amending Decision 2002/253/EC laying down case definitions for reporting communicable diseases to the Community network under Decision No 2119/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (notified under document C(2012) 5538). Official Journal of the European Union. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. 27.09.2012:L 262/1. Available from:

  49. Flisiak R, Halota W, Tomasiewicz K, Kostrzewska K, Razavi HA, Gower EE. Forecasting the disease burden of chronic hepatitis C virus in Poland.Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;27(1):70-6. DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000237 PMID: 25426979

  50. Hartleb M, Gutkowski K, Zejda JE, Chudek J, Więcek A. Serological prevalence of hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus infection in the elderly population: Polish nationwide survey--PolSenior.Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;24(11):1288-95.PMID: 22864260

  51. Sibley A, Han KH, Abourached A, Lesmana LA, Makara M, Jafri W,  et al.  The present and future disease burden of hepatitis C virus infections with today’s treatment paradigm - volume 3. J Viral Hepat. 2015;22(22) Suppl 4;21-41. DOI: 10.1111/jvh.12476 PMID: 26513446

Back to Table of Contents
Previous Download (pdf)

The publisher’s policy on data collection and use of cookies.

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by authors contributing to Eurosurveillance do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) or the editorial team or the institutions with which the authors are affiliated. Neither ECDC nor any person acting on behalf of ECDC is responsible for the use that might be made of the information in this journal. The information provided on the Eurosurveillance site is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between a patient/site visitor and his/her physician. Our website does not host any form of commercial advertisement. Except where otherwise stated, all manuscripts published after 1 January 2016 will be published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence. You are free to share and adapt the material, but you must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

Eurosurveillance [ISSN] - ©2007-2016. All rights reserved

This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information:
verify here.