The new Eurosurveillance website is almost here.

Eurosurveillance is on the updated list of the Directory of Open Access Journals and in the SHERPA/RoMEO database. Read more here.

On 6 June 2017, the World Health Organization (WHO) published updates to its ‘Essential Medicines List’ (EML). Read more here.

Follow Eurosurveillance on Twitter: @Eurosurveillanc

In this issue

Home Eurosurveillance Edition  2016: Volume 21/ Issue 36 Article 3
Back to Table of Contents
Previous Download (pdf)

Eurosurveillance, Volume 21, Issue 36, 08 September 2016
Research article
Regnath, Mertes, and Ignatius: Antimicrobial resistance of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates in south-west Germany, 2004 to 2015: increasing minimal inhibitory concentrations of tetracycline but no resistance to third-generation cephalosporins

+ Author affiliations

Citation style for this article: Regnath T, Mertes T, Ignatius R. Antimicrobial resistance of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates in south-west Germany, 2004 to 2015: increasing minimal inhibitory concentrations of tetracycline but no resistance to third-generation cephalosporins. Euro Surveill. 2016;21(36):pii=30335. DOI:

Received:22 June 2015; Accepted:28 October 2015


Numbers of gonorrhoea cases have increased, and the World Health Organization has estimated 106 million new cases in adults worldwide for 2008, which was 21% higher than numbers for 2005 [1]. At the same time, rising rates of antimicrobial resistance of its causative agent, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, have been reported in many parts of the world including Europe, even against the third-generation cephalosporins, cefixime and ceftriaxone [2,3]. For this reason, cefixime alone is no longer recommended as single-drug treatment for gonorrhoea in Europe or the United States [4,5].

The European Gonococcal Antimicrobial Surveillance Programme (EURO-GASP) was established by 12 European countries in 2004 in response to the emerging antimicrobial resistance of N. gonorrhoeae, as part of the European Surveillance of Sexually Transmitted Infections Project [6]. In 2016, EURO-GASP has participation from laboratories from 21 European Union/European Economic Area countries, which regularly report gonorrhoea susceptibility testing results and epidemiological surveillance data, and submit gonococcal isolates for centralised testing or participate in decentralised testing. Since 2009, EURO-GASP has been coordinated by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Resistance data have been published regularly and in a timely manner [7,8], but the numbers of isolates tested per country are relatively low (between 10 and 251 in 2011 [8]) and therefore most likely not representative of the epidemiological situation of the individual countries.

As cases of gonorrhoea or antimicrobial resistance patterns of N. gonorrhoeae isolates are not subject to reporting in Germany, data regarding current antimicrobial susceptibility and its development over time are scarce. Only three individual studies have addressed this issue in the past 10 years. Abraham et al. analysed 50 isolates collected between 2001 and 2010 in Dresden, Saxony [9], while Horn and colleagues have reported the results of a nationwide surveillance study conducted by the Paul-Ehrlich-Society of Chemotherapy in 2010/2011 in which 213 isolates submitted by 23 laboratories were analysed [10]. Additionally, minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of selected antibiotics for 65 N. gonorrhoeae isolates collected in 2004/2005 in southern Germany have been reported [11]. None of these studies has reported cephalosporin-resistant N. gonorrhoeae isolates. Data from EURO-GASP, however, have provided evidence for the presence of cephalosporin-resistant N. gonorrhoeae isolates in Germany, too [7,8]; in fact, an Austrian patient with a cefixime-resistant N. gonorrhoeae isolate acquired his infection in Munich, south Germany [12].

To gain more information on the antimicrobial susceptibility of N. gonorrhoeae in Germany and elucidate possible changes in antimicrobial resistance occurring over time, we analysed the susceptibility patterns of all N. gonorrhoeae isolates identified and tested in our laboratory between 2004 and 2015 (n = 434). Since age and sex have been identified as risk factors for harbouring antimicrobial-resistant N. gonorrhoeae isolates [13,14], we additionally analysed our data regarding these parameters. Unfortunately, the study design chosen did not provide information regarding other possible risk factors, e.g. working as professional sex worker or being a man who has sex with men (MSM).


Bacterial isolates

Between July 2004 and March 2015, 434 bacterial isolates were grown from swabs obtained from patients aged 16 years and over living in the greater Stuttgart area (a radius of around 50 km from Stuttgart city centre). Although difficult to estimate because N. gonorrhoeae is not mandatorily notifiable, the number of isolates tested may correspond to 30–70% of all isolates detected in that area within the period of time indicated. The samples were mainly submitted by private practitioners (primarily urologists, internists, dermatologists, and gynaecologists). For 284 (65.4%) patients, further samples (swabs or urine) had been submitted for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by PCR. Based on these laboratory results, 36 (12.7%) patients were co-infected with C. trachomatis while 248 (87.3%) were C. trachomatis-negative.

Gram-negative, oxidase-positive diplococci were identified biochemically as N. gonorrhoeae by using the API or the Vitek 2 system (both bioMerieux, Marcy-l Etoile, France). Isolates were subjected immediately to antimicrobial susceptibility testing and subsequently stored at –70 °C for future analyses.

Susceptibility testing

Briefly, bacterial inoculums were prepared in sterile saline at 0.5 McFarland standard and tested against the antibiotics indicated by using the Etest system (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) on Mueller-Hinton chocolate agar, except for testing of azithromycin, for which a chocolate GC II agar with IsoVitaleX was used (both, BD Diagnostic Systems, Heidelberg, Germany) [11]. Plates were incubated at 35–36.5 °C and 5% CO2 for 20–24 hours. Betalactamase production was assessed by using nitrocefin disks (BD Diagnostic Systems). The ATCC N. gonorrhoeae strain 49226 was used as an internal control. Susceptibility was interpreted according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) breakpoints [15,16].

Statistical analyses

Data were statistically analysed by using GraphPad Prism version 6.0a for Mac OS X. Data on antibiotic resistance, patients’ sex, or specialisation of referring practitioners were analysed using the two-tailed Fisher’s exact test. Data regarding age were analysed using the Mann–Whitney U-test. To elucidate potential changes in the antibiotic susceptibility in N. gonorhoeae isolates over time, data also were analysed for two different periods: July 2004 to December 2009 and January 2010 to March 2015, as well as for two-year periods. Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05. Trends were defined as p-values between 0.05 and 0.1.


Resistance patterns

The median age of the patients was 33 years (range: 16–76), 107 (24.7%) were female and 327 (75.3%) were male. Analysis of antimicrobial susceptibility of the isolates to standard antibiotics revealed high proportions of intermediate or resistant isolates for penicillin (90.6%), ciprofloxacin (70.5%), and tetracycline (68.9%) with lower proportions for azithromycin (26.5%; Table 1). No resistance to cefixime, ceftriaxone, or spectinomycin was detected. Thirty-one isolates (7.1%) were susceptible to all antimicrobials tested.

Table 1

Antimicrobial activities of selected antibiotics against Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates, Stuttgart, 2004–2015 (n=434)

MIC (mg/L) % of isolates (S/I/R*)
Antimicrobial agent MIC50 MIC90 Range EUCAST [8] CLSI [9]
Penicillin G 0.5 8 0.002 to >32 9.4/65.0/25.6 9.4/65.0/25.6
Cefixime 0.016 0.03 <0.016 to 0.125 100/NM/0 100/ NM /0
Ceftriaxonea 0.008 0.03 <0.002 to 0.125 100/NM/0 100/NM/0
Azithromycin 0.25 0.5 0.016 to 128 73.5/21.0/5.5 n.d.
Ciprofloxacin 2 32 <0.002 to >32 29.5/0.2/70.3 29.7/5.8/64.5
Tetracycline 2 32 0.016 to >256 31.1/20.5/48.4 17.3/34.3/48.4
Spectinomycin 8 16 1 to 32 100/NM/0 100/NM/0

CLSI: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; EUCAST: European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; I: intermediate; MIC: minimum inhibitory concentrations; n.d.: not determined (no breakpoints available); NM: no MICs for intermediate susceptibility defined; R: resistant; S: susceptible.

a Data available for 432 isolates.

High-level plasmid-mediated resistance to tetracycline (≥ 16 mg/L) was seen in 87 (20.0%) isolates whereas 172 (39.6%) isolates expressed high-level resistance to ciprofloxacin (≥ 4 mg/L). Seventy of 430 (16.3%) for which data on betalactamase production was available were betalactamase positive and thus expressed high-level plasmid-mediated resistance to penicillin. High-level resistance to azithromycin (≥ 256 mg/L) was not detected.

N. gonorrhoeae isolates from female patients (n = 107) were more resistant to penicillin (33.6%, 95% CI: 25.4–43.0% vs 23.2%, 95% CI: 19.0–28.1%; p = 0.041) and ciprofloxacin (78.5%, 95% CI: 69.7–85.3% vs 68.2% 95% CI: 63.0–73.0; p = 0.0499) than isolates from male patients (n = 327). There was no difference regarding resistance to azithromycin or tetracycline (data not shown). Patients older than 25 years (n = 317) and those aged 25 years or younger (n = 117) did not differ regarding resistance to penicillin (p = 0.536), azithromycin (p = 0.481), ciprofloxacin (p = 0.478) or tetracycline (p = 0.450).

Comparison of antimicrobial resistance 2004–2009 vs 2010–2015

Demographic data of the two subpopulations, patients whose isolates were analysed in 2004–2009 and those whose isolates were analysed 2010–2015, were comparable (Table 2). Applying the EUCAST definitions for resistance [15], the proportion of isolates resistant to tetracycline significantly increased and in fact almost doubled (2004–2009, 30.4%; 2010–2015, 55.6%; Table 3). There also was a trend (p = 0.084) towards increasing resistance to azithromycin (2004–2009, 3.0%; 2010–2015, 7.1%; Table 3) while the resistance to penicillin or ciprofloxacin did not change significantly within the study period. A more detailed analysis by plotting the data for two-year periods confirmed this overall pattern for the whole study period (tetracycline, p = 0.006; penicillin, p = 0.411; ciprofloxacin, p = 0.844; azithromycin, p = 0.133; Figure 1); notably, resistance to ciprofloxacin increased between 2004/05 and 2008/09 but decreased thereafter (p < 0.0001, each).

Table 2

Demographic data from Neisseria gonorrhoeae-positive patients, south-west Germany, 2004–2009 vs 2010–2015 (n=414)

Characteristics July 2004 to December 2009 January 2010 to March 2015 p-value
Number of isolates 168 266
Sex 0.909
Female 42 (25.0%) 65 (24.4%)
Male 126 (75.0%) 201 (75.6)
Age in years (median; range) 32; 17-68 34; 16-76 0.718
Specialisation of senders
Urology 78 (47.0%) 149 (56.0%) 0.076
Gynaecology 37 (22.3%) 61 (22.9%) 0.906
Internal medicine 20 (12.0%) 22 (8.3%) 0.235
Dermatology 16 (9.6%) 20 (7.5%) 0.479
Others or no specialisation 15 (9.0%) 14 (5.3%) 0.167

Table 3

Resistance of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates, south-west Germany, 2004–2009 vs 2010–2015 (n=434)

2004–2009 (n=168) 2010–2015 (n=266)
Antibiotic agent No % (95% CI) a No % (95% CI) p
Penicillin G (>1 mg/L) 42 25.0 (19.0-32.1) 69 25.9 (21.0-31.5) 0.910
Azithromycin (>0.5 mg/L) 5 3.0 (1.1-7.0) 19 7.1 (4.6-10.9) 0.084
Ciprofloxacin (>0.06 mg/L) 111 66.1 (58.6-72.8) 194 72.9 (67.3-77.9) 0.133
Tetracycline (>1 mg/L) 62 36.9 (30.0-44.4) 148 55.6 (49.6-61.5) 0.0002

CI: confidence interval.

a Percentage of resistant isolates defined by European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoints plus 95% CI.

Figure 1

Percentages of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates resistant to penicillin, azithromycin, ciprofloxacin, or tetracycline, south-west Germany, 2004–2015


AZT: azithromoycin; CIP: ciprofloxacin; PEN: penicillin; TET: tetracycline.

Analysis of the individual MICs of the seven antibiotics tested revealed some minor changes for most antibiotics (Figure 2). In contrast, proportions of isolates with MICs of 0.5 or 1 mg/L to tetracycline decreased considerably while those of isolates with MICs of 2, 4 or ≥32 mg/L increased (Figure 2F). Likewise, the increase in isolates with MICs > 0.5 mg/L to azithromycin became evident but the proportions of isolates with MICs of 0.125 and 0.25 mg/L were rather higher in the second period than before (Figure 2D). The unique pattern of ciprofloxacin revealed two groups of isolates, i.e. one expressing very low MICs and the other one with MICs ≥ 0.5 mg/L while there were almost no isolates with MICs at the level of the EUCAST breakpoint concentration, 0.06 mg/L, or slightly higher or lower (Figure 2E). Notably, there was a stable pattern for both cefixime and ceftriaxone, excluding also potential shifts of MICs at lower concentrations (Figure 2B and C), which might go undetected when only the breakpoints are considered.

Figure 2

Antimicrobial susceptibility of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates to (A) penicillin G, (B) cefixime, (C) ceftriaxone, (D) azithromycin, (E) ciprofloxacin, (F) tetracycline and (G) spectinomycin, south-west Germany, July 2004 to December 2015 (n=168) vs January 2010 to March 2015 (n=266)


Blue bars (n=168) represent isolates from July 2004 to December 2009. Yellow bars (n=266) represent isolates from January 2010 to March 2015.


Although we were unable to detect cephalosporin-resistant N. gonorrhoeae isolates within the study period, cefixime resistance has been reported for many European countries including Germany [8]. Thus, our data, although in line with two recently published German studies [9,10], cannot be considered representative for the situation in Germany, but they indicate that the true overall cefixime resistance rate in Germany may be considerably lower than the 10.2% reported for 2011 by EURO-GASP [8]. In fact, all laboratory results may strongly depend on the area where the samples were collected and the numbers of patients included from high-risk groups. Our key finding in this context, however, is the absence of an increase in MICs to cephalosporins from the period 2004–2009 to the period 2010–2015 (Figure 1). Thus, a possible rise in cephalosporin-resistance in the future may not be the result of previous and current (mis-)usage of cefixime in the local population, but rather due to the introduction of new resistant strains into that population.

The EUCAST breakpoint of cefixime may be too high, as N. gonorrhoeae isolates with this or lower MICs have been described as the cause of infections that did not resolve under cefixime standard therapy [8]. Considering a breakpoint of 0.06 mg/L, seven isolates (1.6%) tested by us with a MIC of 0.125 mg/L were resistant to cefixime.

We detected azithromycin resistance in 5.5% of the isolates and none of the isolates expressed high-level resistance; both findings correspond to the data recently published by Horn et al. [10]. In contrast, an azithromycin resistance rate of 0.9% has been reported for Germany by EURO-GASP [8]. Notably, we observed a strong trend towards more isolates with MICs > 0.5 mg/L of azithromycin from the period 2004­–2009 to 2010–2015 (p = 0.084), although in Europe, resistance significantly decreased between 2009 and 2011 [8]. Still, increasing azithromycin high-level resistance of N. gonorrhoeae isolates and a concomitant decline in isolates expressing decreased susceptibility have been shown for Scotland from 2004 to 2007 [17] from where it appears to have spread to England and Wales [18]. Only single high-level resistant isolates have been shown for other European countries, including Italy [19], Sweden [20], France [21] and Ireland [22]. To prevent further increasing resistance to this valuable drug, azithromycin usage should be limited to patients who need to be treated with this drug, i.e. patients with allergy to cephalosporins or patients with simultaneous chlamydial infection (in which case azithromycin should be given together with cephalosporins) and those for whom no drug susceptibility testing of the causative agents can be performed.

The highest resistance rate was observed for ciprofloxacin (70.3%). This is in accordance with the data published by Horn et al. [10] while resistance rates of around 50% have been reported by others for Germany [8,9]. Resistance rates for ciprofloxacin are also high in most other European countries [8], and this might be a sign of a still high fluoroquinolone usage by practitioners for the empirical treatment of gonorrhoeae, as ciprofloxacin resistance of N. gonorrhoeae has been shown to decline after cessation of ciprofloxacin usage [23]. It remains unclear at the moment, however, whether the observed increase and decrease of ciprofloxacin resistance correlates with changes in ciprofloxacin usage within the study period. In contrast to the other antimicrobials tested, MICs to ciprofloxacin showed a bimodal distribution similar to what has been shown for N. gonorrhoeae isolates from Japan [24].

Tetracycline resistance also was high (as previously observed by others [10]), and increased significantly within the study period (from 27.5% in 2004/2005 to 57.7% in 2014/2015). This might reflect its wide usage. Doxycyline was the second most commonly prescribed antimicrobial drug in German outpatient departments in 2011 [25]. When we compared the antimicrobial susceptibility for 2004–2009 vs 2010–2015, considerably more isolates were included in the latter than in the former period, although the second period was three months shorter than the earlier one. Even if it must remain speculative at the moment, this finding might indicate a true increase in cases of gonorrhoea in the past years, similar to what has been reported for England and Sweden [26,27], and thus may correspond to the trend reported for syphilis in Germany [28]. A reintroduction of the previous obligation to report all cases of gonorrhoea in Germany, currently under discussion, may answer this question in the future. An increasing gonorrhoea incidence, however, also might at least partially result from the previously discussed ciprofloxacin usage for empirical treatment of the infection in the presence of high resistance rates to this drug [29].

We did not detect spectinomycin resistance. This might be due to its long-lasting non-usage, since its usage leads to increasing resistance rates [30]. Thus, this drug could potentially be used for the empirical treatment of gonorrhoea. Known limitations, however, are its unavailability in many European countries including Germany and its reduced effectiveness in the treatment of pharyngeal gonorrhoea [31].

In contrast to previous publications [13,14], we did not observe age-related differences in susceptibility rates, and isolates from female patients showed higher resistance rates than those from male patients. This might be due to differences in study populations. One limitation of our study in this context is the fact that we do not have information regarding patients who may belong to high-risk populations. For instance, it has been shown that N. gonorrhoeae isolates from MSM are more resistant to antimicrobials than those collected from men who have sex with women [32,33]. Likewise, infected commercial sex workers are more likely to harbour resistant N. gonorrhoeae isolates than other patients [32,34]. In contrast, a recent EURO-GASP study has demonstrated decreasing cefixime MICs for N. gonorrhoeae of MSM for the period 2009–2011, and highest MICs for isolates from men who have sex with women [13]. Furthermore, around 75% of the bacterial isolates analysed in the present study were collected from men; thus, our data may be more valid for male than for female patients.

In conclusion, the current resistance situation of N. gonorrhoeae isolates in south-west Germany may be less dramatic than in other parts of Germany or other European countries. High resistance rates to some antimicrobials and changes of susceptibility over time, however, call for a more stringent monitoring system, e.g. the obligation of every laboratory to report all N. gonorrhoeae isolates together with their susceptibility testing results.


We thank Hajer Zoghlami and Carina Rausch for their expert assistance.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Authors’ contributions

TR designed the study, analysed the data, and wrote the manuscript; TM designed the study, contributed bacterial isolates, and wrote the manuscript; RI analysed the data and wrote the manuscript.


  1. World Health Organization (WHO). Global incidence and prevalence of selected curable sexually transmitted infections—2008. Geneva: WHO; 2012. Available from:

  2. Unemo M, Shafer WM. Antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the 21st century: past, evolution, and future.Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014;27(3):587-613. DOI: 10.1128/CMR.00010-14 PMID: 24982323

  3. Lewis DA. Global resistance of Neisseria gonorrhoeae: when theory becomes reality.Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2014;27(1):62-7. DOI: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000025 PMID: 24275696

  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Update to CDC’s Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2010: oral cephalosporins no longer a recommended treatment for gonococcal infections.MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012;61(31):590-4.PMID: 22874837

  5. Bignell C, Unemo M, European STI Guidelines Editorial Board. 2012 European guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of gonorrhoea in adults.Int J STD AIDS. 2013;24(2):85-92. DOI: 10.1177/0956462412472837 PMID: 24400344

  6. Martin IM, Hoffmann S, Ison CA. ESSTI Network. European Surveillance of Sexually Transmitted Infections (ESSTI): the first combined antimicrobial susceptibility data for Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Western Europe.J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006;58(3):587-93. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkl265 PMID: 16816397

  7. Cole MJ, Unemo M, Hoffmann S, Chisholm SA, Ison CA, van de Laar MJ. The European gonococcal antimicrobial surveillance programme, 2009.Euro Surveill. 2011;16(42):19995.PMID: 22027378

  8. Cole MJ, Spiteri G, Chisholm SA, Hoffmann S, Ison CA, Unemo M,  et al.  Emerging cephalosporin and multidrug-resistant gonorrhoea in Europe. Euro Surveill. 2014;19(45):20955. DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES2014.19.45.20955 PMID: 25411689

  9. Abraham S, Poehlmann C, Spornraft-Ragaller P. Gonorrhea: Data on antibiotic resistance and accompanying infections at the University Hospital Dresden over a 10-year time period.J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2013;11(3):241-9.PMID: 23194411

  10. Horn NN, Kresken M, Körber-Irrgang B, Göttig S, Wichelhaus C, Wichelhaus TA. Working Party Antimicrobial Resistance of the Paul Ehrlich Society for Chemotherapy. Antimicrobial susceptibility and molecular epidemiology of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Germany.Int J Med Microbiol. 2014;304(5-6):586-91.DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2014.04.001 PMID: 24801146

  11. Enders M, Turnwald-Maschler A, Regnath T. Antimicrobial resistance of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates from the Stuttgart and Heidelberg areas of southern Germany.Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006;25(5):318-22.DOI: 10.1007/s10096-006-0134-y PMID: 16733613

  12. Unemo M, Golparian D, Stary A, Eigentler A. First Neisseria gonorrhoeae strain with resistance to cefixime causing gonorrhoea treatment failure in Austria, 2011.Euro Surveill. 2011;16(43):19998. PMID: 22085601

  13. Cole MJ, Spiteri G, Town K, Unemo M, Hoffmann S, Chisholm SA,  et al.  Euro-GASP Network. Risk factors for antimicrobial-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Europe. Sex Transm Dis. 2014;41(12):723-9. DOI: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000185 PMID: 25581808

  14. Yu RX, Yin Y, Wang GQ, Chen SC, Zheng BJ, Dai XQ,  et al.  Worldwide susceptibility rates of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates to cefixime and cefpodoxime: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e87849. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087849 PMID: 24498212

  15. EUCAST. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Version 5.0, 2015. Available from:

  16. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; twenty-third informational supplement. CLSI document M100-S23. Wayne, PA: CLSI: 2013.

  17. Palmer HM, Young H, Winter A, Dave J. Emergence and spread of azithromycin-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Scotland.J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008;62(3):490-4. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkn235 PMID: 18552343

  18. Chisholm SA, Neal TJ, Alawattegama AB, Birley HD, Howe RA, Ison CA. Emergence of high-level azithromycin resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae in England and Wales.J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009;64(2):353-8. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkp188 PMID: 19468025

  19. Starnino S, Stefanelli P. Neisseria gonorrhoeae Italian Study Group. Azithromycin-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains recently isolated in Italy.J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009;63(6):1200-4. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkp118 PMID: 19357159

  20. Unemo M, Golparian D, Hellmark B. First three Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates with high-level resistance to azithromycin in Sweden: a threat to currently available dual-antimicrobial regimens for treatment of gonorrhea?Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(1):624-5. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02093-13 PMID: 24189248

  21. Berçot B, Belkacem A, Goubard A, Mougari F, Sednaoui P, La Ruche G,  et al.  High-level azithromycin-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae clinical isolate in France, March 2014. Euro Surveill. 2014;19(44):20951. DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES2014.19.44.20951 PMID: 25394255

  22. Lynagh Y, Mac Aogáin M, Walsh A, Rogers TR, Unemo M, Crowley B. Detailed characterization of the first high-level azithromycin-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae cases in Ireland.J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015;70(8):2411-3. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkv106 PMID: 25907073

  23. Espinosa K, Park JA, Gerrity JJ, Buono S, Shearer A, Dick C,  et al.  Fluoroquinolone resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae after cessation of ciprofloxacin usage in San Francisco: using molecular typing to investigate strain turnover. Sex Transm Dis. 2015;42(2):57-63. DOI: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000233 PMID: 25585061

  24. Hamasuna R, Yasuda M, Ishikawa K, Uehara S, Takahashi S, Hayami H,  et al.  Nationwide surveillance of the antimicrobial susceptibility of Neisseria gonorrhoeae from male urethritis in Japan. J Infect Chemother. 2013;19(4):571-8. DOI: 10.1007/s10156-013-0637-2 PMID: 23813093

  25. Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety. Paul-Ehrlich-Gesellschaft für Chemotherapie e.V., Infectiology Freiburg, eds. GERMAP 2012 – Report on the consumption of antimicrobials and the spread of antimicrobial resistance in human and veterinary medicine in Germany. Rheinbach: Antiinfectives Intelligence; 2014. Available from:

  26. Velicko I, Unemo M. Recent trends in gonorrhoea and syphilis epidemiology in Sweden: 2007 to 2011.Euro Surveill. 2012;17(29):20223.PMID: 22835468

  27. Savage EJ, Marsh K, Duffell S, Ison CA, Zaman A, Hughes G. Rapid increase in gonorrhoea and syphilis diagnoses in England in 2011.Euro Surveill. 2012;17(29):22224.PMID: 22835469

  28. Bremer V, Marcus U, Hamouda O. Syphilis on the rise again in Germany--results from surveillance data for 2011.Euro Surveill. 2012;17(29):20222.PMID: 22835467

  29. Chesson HW, Kirkcaldy RD, Gift TL, Owusu-Edusei K, Weinstock HS. Ciprofloxacin resistance and gonorrhea incidence rates in 17 cities, United States, 1991-2006.Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20(4):612-9. DOI: 10.3201/eid2004.131288 PMID: 24655615

  30. Kubanova A, Frigo N, Kubanov A, Sidorenko S, Lesnaya I, Polevshikova S,  et al.  The Russian gonococcal antimicrobial susceptibility programme (RU-GASP)--national resistance prevalence in 2007 and 2008, and trends during 2005-2008. Euro Surveill. 2010;15(14):19533.PMID: 20394716

  31. Lindberg M, Ringertz O, Sandström E. Treatment of pharyngeal gonorrhea due to beta-lactamase-producing gonococci.Br J Vener Dis. 1982;58(2):101-4.PMID: 6461385

  32. Koedijk FD, van Veen MG, de Neeling AJ, Linde GB, van der Sande MA. Increasing trend in gonococcal resistance to ciprofloxacin in The Netherlands, 2006-8.Sex Transm Infect. 2010;86(1):41-5. DOI: 10.1136/sti.2009.037135 PMID: 19703843

  33. Kirkcaldy RD, Zaidi A, Hook EW, Holmes KK, Soge O, del Rio C,  et al.  Neisseria gonorrhoeae antimicrobial resistance among men who have sex with men and men who have sex exclusively with women: the Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project, 2005-2010. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(5 Pt 1):321-8. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-5-201303050-00004 PMID: 23460055

  34. Mason PR, Gwanzura L, Latif AS, Marowa E, Ray S, Katzenstein DA. Antimicrobial resistance in gonococci isolated from patients and from commercial sex workers in Harare, Zimbabwe.Int J Antimicrob Agents. 1997;9(3):175-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0924-8579(97)00052-6 PMID: 9552714

Back to Table of Contents
Previous Download (pdf)

The publisher’s policy on data collection and use of cookies.

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by authors contributing to Eurosurveillance do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) or the editorial team or the institutions with which the authors are affiliated. Neither ECDC nor any person acting on behalf of ECDC is responsible for the use that might be made of the information in this journal. The information provided on the Eurosurveillance site is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between a patient/site visitor and his/her physician. Our website does not host any form of commercial advertisement. Except where otherwise stated, all manuscripts published after 1 January 2016 will be published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence. You are free to share and adapt the material, but you must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

Eurosurveillance [ISSN] - ©2007-2016. All rights reserved

This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information:
verify here.